The depiction of women in Ragtime
As Ragtime takes place in the early 1900s, Doctorow’s depictions of race and gender are particularly important to pay attention to. Doctorow clearly addresses racial injustices with his depiction of the wealthy Coalhouse and his car, but doesn’t seem to address gender discrimination as blatantly. Whether Doctorow intentionally tried to address sexism and gender relations or not, it is necessary to analyze the depictions of women in Ragtime to better understand Doctorow’s criticisms of this time period.
Two of the primary women in the novel are Mother and Evelyn Nesbit. The fact that Mother is a fictional character gives Doctorow more freedom to take her story wherever he pleases, and in a way that is most convenient for the novel. At the beginning of the novel, Mother is depicted as weak and submissive to Father. It takes his leaving for her to find agency in her life and independence by reading works of Emma Goldman and of course, being introduced to Sarah’s baby. Although the reader is able to see a stark and feminist shift in Mother’s behavior, I don’t believe this was ultimately Doctorow’s intention. I think the purpose of Mother’s newfound confidence and responsibility more serves to show the fact that Father is losing control and power over his family - to emphasize that the idea of American prosperity actually hurt Father’s American masculinity. Thus, one could argue that Doctorow is painting a feminist storyline here, but it is still focused on ‘the man of the house.’
Evelyn is a stark contrast to Mother in that she is shown as wealthy and high-class, but even then, still airheaded and shallow. Her interactions with the Little Girl give some insight into her more personal motivations as she asserts herself as a ‘Mother’ figure even if Tateh isn’t completely comfortable with that. This is largely due to her privilege as a white woman, but Doctorow uses this part of the story more to show Evelyn’s desperation to be understood and to have a real companion. As Doctorow juxtaposes Evelyn’s scenes with Emma Goldman (where she is often ridiculed) with her scenes with the Little Girl (where Evelyn gets to feel like a hero), the reader can feel Evelyn’s need to be loved whenever she is shot down, portraying her as weak.
Overall, I don’t believe that Doctorow intends to make a commentary on women’s issues in Ragtime. However, a running theme among his female characters seems to be desperation and a lack of understanding of one’s self. This could be seen as a commentary that “The American Dream” pushes women into a secondary and lost role.
I don't think Evelyn is depicted as an airhead. I think she is actually depicted as very intelligent and uses her disadvantages to get ahead by attaching herself to wealthy men. That being said, she is definitely in her situation because of the patriarchal system Doctorow represents. I think his comments on gender norms are more subtle but I don't think he is reinforcing them.
ReplyDeleteI agree that feminist themes probably aren't completely purposeful on the part of Doctorow, or at least not something he was focused on. I do think he was likely aware those themes were there and left them be, more so in the case of Mother and maybe Emma Goldman, but he ultimately didn't want to dig into that particularly issue. However, there are parts of the book and aspects of the way he treats his female characters that makes me think he actually doesn't care or believe in feminist ideas. You pointed out a running theme of desperation on the part of the female characters, which I also noticed. I think there's also another theme with Evelyn and Mother where their main worth and characteristics come from their role as a mother-figure. Evelyn just wants to take care of the Little Girl (in a slightly obsessive and creepy way), and Mother's "maternal" qualities are constantly being pointed out/emphasized. It's probably the presence of Emma Goldman that tips the scales for me, because I do genuinely think Doctorow respects Goldman and the views she holds, both the anarchist and feminist ones. He just doesn't always deal with his female characters' storylines with the depth and care I feel like they deserve (particularly in the case of Evelyn)
ReplyDeleteThis post presents a really interesting interpretation. I understand how it can be read in this way, with the womens' storylines being consistently underdeveloped. However, I wouldn't personally go so far. Emma Goldman is to me one of the most strong-willed and ideologically consistent characters in the novel, fully on par with younger brother or even Coalhouse. I also think that Nesbit's image to the broader public was perhaps that of an airhead, but we as readers got to know her on a much deeper level and I'm not sure we could call her that with full confidence. I think the strongest case for your point is with mother, and I appreciate the glimpse at a new perspective.
ReplyDeleteI definitely agree with you that Emma Goldman is absolutely not portrayed in much of a desperate way - she is extremely independent and has no problem sticking up for her values. However, I think that Evelyn's character definitely shifted over the book, and we embrace her as less "air-headed" throughout the novel. Nonetheless, I do think her initial impression might have stuck for some audiences.
DeleteThere are many narratives and ideals at play throughout Ragtime: racism and revolutionary violence with the story of Coalhouse Walker, society and its capitalist nature with the story of Tateh, finding ones identity and how one goes about finding that purpose in life with the story of Younger Brother, and many others. As you described, Gender and the concept of Femininity is definitely on of those narratives that stretch throughout the novel within the female characters. Each of the female characters have their own storyline in which they are defined by. Evelyn has her sense of wealth and upper-class and how that conflicts with wanting to be "normal." Mother has her role as the mother with the baby and family she invites to live with her. Finally, Goldman has the rock solid confidence instilled in every one of her ideals. These contrasts, especially when it comes to the question of gender and femininity as you described, makes this novel an interesting ground for discussion.
ReplyDeleteYeah, I definitely agree with a lot of your points here. Mainly at the beginning of the book, I feel like the book gave more of an objectified description of Mother and Evelyn Nesbit, with Evelyn as the helpless young sex icon and Mother as the quintessential comforting maternal figure. However, I think as the story progresses and we get some portions of it from their perspective, their characters grow quite a bit, and in my opinion, subvert the original stereotypical tropes they are categorized as at the start of the novel. The "daft" Evelyn Nesbit end up donating to anarchist organizations, while the "submissive and proper" Mother ends up marrying a socialist Jew. I would agree that the descriptions of the female characters sometimes seem to be in a mocking tone, or the characters themselves generally come across as ignorant, however, I would argue that that tone applies to all characters within the story. The narrator's tone is generally pretty condescending, so I read it as the story describes of all its characters as if it was above them all.
ReplyDeleteI like a lot of your points here- I just don't think Doctorow was intending all of this. He depicts women in a questionable nature throughout the entire book- from Evelyn's creepy obsession with the little girl to picking and choosing strange aspects to let them shine as characters. (Mother's adorance of the Coalhouse/Sarah arc, the weird scenes with MYB just completely skimmed past). I don't think this novel is very feminist. I think this book is more about racism and nativism than anything else, the issues with women coming from a place of wealth and not about sexism if that makes sense. It's generally hard to tell through the irony of this book however. The entire treatment of the MYB and Evelyn relationship bit is hard for me to get past, so I'm not sure that Doctorow is really trying to be the feminist author he halfway comes across as.
ReplyDeleteThis is an interesting post, I hadn't really thought about women in the book until now. I don't really agree with your analysis of Mother, and that her newfound confidence and activism is in the book to show Father's failing. I think that Doctorow was more so pointing out that Father being upset and feeling shunned because of his wife's new traits was wrong - as in, he was less making fun of Fathers role in the household, but more so his backwards mindset. Mother's activism and enlightenment definitely seemed to be portrayed as positive growth for her, rather than negative growth for Father.
ReplyDeleteI agree. I thought seeing Evelyn grapple with her role in society as a woman, even as a wealthy, desirable, white woman, was really interesting. I really wish that we had gotten a closer look into her life after meeting Emma (like her philanthropy), and that Doctorow had done a little more with Mother, maybe pushed her harder. I would have loved to see an interaction between Mother and Emma or a similar character. Or maybe another woman: Sarah? It just would have been nice to see some more perspectives on what it was like to be a woman at the time
ReplyDeleteI didn't consider this viewpoint while reading but now that you say it, it seems obvious. Ragtime was written by a 44 year old guy in 1975, how women thought was probably not what he was thinking about at all. I find your views on Mother's confidence to be the most representative of this as well as the most interesting.
ReplyDelete